FEATURED

Success Story 42: Due to FOICA the Concept of the Struggle against Disinformation was Adopted

Thanks to two years of efforts of FOICA and active cooperation with partners, the Concept and the Action Plan of the Struggle against Disinformation 2024-2026 were adopted. The documents were developed by the Freedom of Information Center of Armenia.

Success Story 41: Thanks to the court case FOICA received the requested information

In January 2024, the "Civil Pact" party, after the FOICA appealed to the court, asked to sign a settlement agreement and provided the required information on pre-election fundraising.

Success Story 40: FOICA vs. 7 Municipalities, A 5-Year Judicial Marathon

This is the first court precedent in Armenia, which refers to proactive transparency; the local public authority was obliged to fulfill the duty established by the FOI law to ensure proactive transparency, based on a judicial act.

FOICA On Facebook

FOICA on Youtube

Freedom of Information Center of Armenia FOICA

Success Story 36։ The Ombudsman Made a Decision in favor of FOICA

December 8, 2021

The Human Rights Defender of the Republic of Armenia confirmed the fact of violation of the Freedom of Information Center’s right to receive information by the Yerevan Municipality.

FOICA applied to the Human Rights Defender asking for assistance in restoring the violated right of information. For three months, starting from August, 2021 FOICA has been trying to get information from the Municipality about an activities of an illegally exploited stone factory and seizure of the land of the community. Several requests and even complaints submitted to the Municipality were not properly processed.

As a result of the proceedings, the Ombudsman decided:

The Human Rights Defender considers principal the provision of the answers to the requests for information in complete, quality way, within deadlines, as well as to provide the bases of denials and, in general, the attitude of public bodies towards those inquiries.
Aforementioned approach by public authorities may form a practice leading to the risk of continuing to provide incomplete information or refusing to provide information in general.
Therefore, every State or local authority body is obliged to respond responsibly to requests for information, to ensure its complete and proper provision, which will guarantee the proper exercise of the right to receive information enshrined in the Constitution, laws and international documents.
As for the issue of illegal land use, it is necessary to refer to Article 59, Part 1, Clause 1 of the Law Of The Republic of Armenia on Local Self-Government according to which the Mayor organizes the suspension and elimination of illegal land use by heads of administrative districts.
Thus, after the above-mentioned legal regulation, suspension and elimination of illegal land use in the city of Yerevan is the responsibility of the Mayor of Yerevan, so the answer of Shushan Doydoyan’s request is also in the competence of the Municipality of Yerevan.
The Defender states that by not providing a proper, complete response to the Freedom of Information Center NGO President Shushan Doydoyan’s requests, the Yerevan Municipality violated her right to receive information stated by the RA Constitution, the RA Law on Freedom of Information, and international documents.

By the same decision, the Defender proposed to the Yerevan Municipality to provide proper and complete information to the requests discussed within the framework of the given decision.

Тhe Ombudsman Decision (Armenian)