News and Events

News and events

FEATURED

The 9th meeting of the Working Group on Access to Information of the Aarhus Convention, dedicated to access to information, public participation in decision-making processes, and access to justice in environmental matters, is being held at the Palais des Nations in Geneva on November 7-8.

FOICA On Facebook

FOICA on Youtube

Success Story 20։ Director of the SNCO was Held Liable

Director of the Yerevan Building Investment Program Implementation Unit SNCO Ruben Harutyunyan was held liable by the decision of December 24, 2013, of the RA Administrative Court for violating the right to freedom of information. This is the third similar precedent when an official has imposed a fine for 50,000 AMD for violating the freedom of information right.

Back in 2009, FOICA had sent a written request to the SNCO asking to provide information on SNCO funding from the state budget as well as on the agreements signed. The SNCO had rejected to provide this information citing the law On State Budget as to the funding from the state budget, while in case of agreements, the SNCO had stated that the information was not subject to be provided since it contained commercial secret. FOICA had challenged SNCO’s refusal. From the very beginning, the case was divided into 2 separate cases, one on recognizing SNCO’s actions as non-legitimate and obliging SNCO to provide the requested information and the other on requiring to subject the SNCO Director to administrative liability.

The case on subjecting the SNCO Director to administrative liability was suspended on June 16, 2009, until the case on recognizing the SNCO’s actions as non-legitimate was over. This case, passing through all judicial instances, ended up with FOICAs winning on January 18, 2012. The suspended case on holding the SNCO Director liable restarted on March 12, 2013. On December 24, 2013, the RA Administrative Court judged this case, upholding the FOICA lawsuit and subjecting SNCO Director Ruben Harutyunyan to administrative liability.
Note that the first similar case, when an official was fined 50,000 AMD, was FOICA vs. Yelpin village mayor office in 2009; and in the second case, the information holder being subjected to administrative liability in 2013 was not a state agency but a private organization of public significance, Dustr Marianna LLC.

SHARE ON:

Skip to content